aprendizado
automática aquisição do corpo
hábitos corporais
 “The acquisition of a habit
[including our habits of speech and thought] is indeed the grasping of
a significance, but it is the motor grasping of a motor significance”;
“it is the body which ‘understands’ in the acquisition of habit.”
 “incorporate them
into the bulk of our own body” through unreflective processes ofmotor
sedimentation and our own spontaneous corporeal sense of self
(PP 167–9/143–4/165–7)

body schema, de novo...
hábito do corpo sedimentado

“the anonymous alertness of the senses” (PP 191/164/190)

Merleau-POnty fala tudo isso em teorias sobre o corpo,
será que ele não tinha ilusões?
e há um corpo reflexivo, 
afinal, se o corpo é o meu fundamento no mundo, e não é o reflexivo
a filosofia ficará mancando?

ahhhhhhhhhhhhh...............
esqueceu da fenomenologia da percepção ...descrição?
ok, não..

 “The limping of philosophy is its virtue,”
he writes, in contrasting the philosopher with the man of action by
contrasting “that which understands and that which chooses.” “The
philosopher of action is perhaps the farthest removed from action,
for to speak of action with depth and rigor is to say that one does
not desire to act” (EP 59–61/59–61).

As opposed to
men of action, the philosopher, says Merleau-Ponty, is never fully
engaged in a practical “serious” way in what he affirms. Even in the
causes to which he is faithful, we find that “in his assent something
massive and carnal is lacking. He is not altogether a real being”
(EP 60/60).